Islamic Voice A Monthly English Magazine

September 2008 Ramdan Issue
COVER PAGE TRAVELOGUE THE MUSLIM WORLD COMMUNITY ROUND UP EDITORIAL LETTERS OPINION COMMUNITY INITIATIVE MUSLIM PERSPECTIVES MUSLIMS & MEDIA UPDATE GLOBE TALK MUSLIMS & SOCIETY PROFILE VIEWPOINT WOMEN'S SPACE THE WORLD OF INTERNET BOOK REVIEW TOWARDS LIGHT LIVING ISLAM LIFE & RELATIONSHIPS SOUL TALK REFLECTIONS QUR'AN SPEAKS TO YOU HADITH OUR DIALOGUE CHILDREN'S CORNER MATRIMONIAL RAMADAN FIQH
ZAKAT Camps/Workshops Jobs Archives Feedback Subscription Links Calendar Contact Us

WOMEN'S SPACE

Confronting the Culprit
By M. Hanif Lakdawala
Every woman has the right to safe travel. Lewd stares, songs, obscene words and threats which women face while travelling by public transport should be treated as violent crimes.


Raisa Baig, 18, a student of Mass Media had to spend three hours at the police station in South Mumbai to lodge a complaint against a man who physically touched her intentionally when she was commuting to college by bus.

When she was struggling with the molester, not a single fellow traveler came to her rescue and she had to fight it out single-handedly. This happened in a Muslim dominated area and the victim and culprit both were Muslims.

Most people, including the woman herself, feel that lewd stares, songs, obscene words and threats are not ‘as bad’ as rape. As the reaction of co-passengers and police highlight, there is a hierarchy of violence where some offences are more acceptable and treated as ‘normal’. This is a fallacy that ignores what a woman faces every time she leaves the house, bracing herself for any such abuse. Every woman has the right to safe travel.

Women must realise that it is not ‘their fault’ that such crimes occur. “Often we are made to feel ashamed, and therefore made to maintain silence when we do face abuse. We are blamed by authorities, perpetrators and on-lookers alike for, say, our clothes, daring to go out at night, travelling on a train alone and so on”, said Raisa.

Why Raisa took the trouble of confronting the culprit at the grave risk? “By recognizing that this stigma is constructed, and by speaking out against it, I wanted to identify the attitude of the culprit that humiliated and victimised me. Only through highlighting the occurrence and extent of the phenomenon will the appropriate authorities take responsibility and act,” she said.

This writer spoke to 14 women for this article. Every woman had an experience of such violence to recount. Hearing the experiences of so many women indicate the pervasiveness of such incidents as well as the helplessness felt by women traveling in trains and bus.

Abida Khan, 32, a teacher with the primary school in south Mumbai also faces similar sexual harassment while traveling in bus. “I find myself totally helpless. I feel I have no power or social support to stop such abuses, even though it occurs frequently in very public spaces and in front of many people she said. Once Abida confr-onted the culprit, but she was shocked that co-passengers ignored the incident, not wanting to get involved, or ‘has-sled’ with ‘pro-blems’.

Many women said that passengers watch the scene as a form of entert-ainment. The comments of the onlookers frequently favour the offenders, reflecting a lack of understanding and sensitivity of the woman’s situation.

Asiya Dawrey, 29, working in a Bank, frequently faces sexual harassment while traveling. “People often express surprise as to why she is making a ‘big deal’ over a stare, a touch or a song. The violation of a woman’s rights, her dignity and her subsequent response and demand for justice is considered melodramatic,” said Asiya.

“Crimes against women are growing by day, but most women still shy away from learning self-defense skills, they rather react negatively and see it as tomboyish and unladylike, or they think themselves too old for it”, says Arvind Khaire, director, Women’s Self-Defence Foundation.
“Today crimes against them are on a rise at an alarming rate, and every woman is a potential victim, irrespective of her age,’’ says Khaire, in a new book, ``Against Close Encounters: Every Woman’s Survival Manual’’.

Women are teased openly and molested mercilessly, every day. Self-protection gears up a woman to fight all this. But Khaire says, “upon being advised to take up self-protection courses, most women react negatively, as they misunderstand the meaning of the term ‘self-protection’.”

“The most important aspects of self-protection are the awareness to recognize potential danger, avoid or neutralize any tense situation with assertiveness, verbal tactics, safety strategies and resorting to physical tactics as a last effort, which enables the would-be victim to effectively prevent, resist, escape and survive a close encounter”, says Khaire.

Asserting yourself is an important part of taking control of your life. If some behaviour is making you feel bad, uncomfortable, scared, confront the person. Tell them what you want them to do. “You’re constantly touching me. I don’t like it. Stop it.”

If someone is bothering you in a public place, make a scene! It will be much more embarrassing for that person than for you! Voice is a weapon, too. Getting right in to someone’s face and screaming will throw them. Yelling, alerts other people and can freak an attacker out. It can also help channel your fear into aggression. Shout “NO!”

Remember, if your gut feeling tells you something immoral going on - DO SOMETHING, whether it’s confronting the person, getting to safety, calling someone for help.

It is critical that family members and members of the public recognise that sexual harassment is a crime and is not the result of a woman’s behaviour, her appearance etc. They must support women who speak out and want to take action, and not be embarrassed by it or insinuate that she “asked for it.” It is unlikely that women will be able to act against sexual harassment without this support.
A Woman's Reflection on Leading Prayer
By Yasmin Mogahed
What we so often forget is that God has honored the woman by giving her value in relation to God, not in relation to men.


'Given my privilege as a woman, I only degrade Myself by trying to be something I’m not—and in all honesty—don’ t want to be: a man. As women, we will never reach true liberation until we stop trying to mimic men, and value the beauty in our own God-given distinctiveness'.

On March 18, 2005, Amina Wadud led the first female-led Jumuah (Friday) prayer. On that day, women took a huge step towards being more like men. But, did we come closer to actualizing our God given liberation? I Don’t think so.

What we so often forget is that God has honored the woman by giving her value in relation to God not in relation to men. But as western feminism erases God from the scene, there are no standards left, but men. As a result, the western feminist is forced to find her value in relation to a man. And in so doing she has accepted a faulty assumption. She has accepted that man is the standard, and thus a woman can never be a full human being until she becomes just like a man-the standard.

When a man cut his hair short, she wanted to cut her hair short. When a man joined the army, she wanted to join the army. She wanted these things for no other reason than because the ‘standard’ had it. What she didn’t recognize was that God dignifies both men and women in their distinctiveness—not their sameness. And on March 18, Muslim women made the very same mistake.
For 1400 years there has been a consensus of the scholars that men are to lead prayer. As a Muslim woman, why does this matter? The one who leads prayer is not spiritually superior in any way. Something is not better just because a man does it. And leading prayer is not better, just because it’s leading. Had it been the role of women or had it been more divine, why wouldn’t the Prophet have asked Ayesha or Khadija, or Fatima-the greatest women of all time-to lead?
These women were promised heaven-and yet they never led prayer.

But now for the first time in 1400 years, we look at a man leading prayer and we think, ‘That’s not fair.’ We think so, although God has given no special privilege to the one who leads. The imam is no higher in the eyes of God than the one who prays behind.

On the other hand, only a woman can be a mother. And God has given special privilege to a mother. The Prophet taught us that heaven lies at the feet of mothers. But no matter what a man does he can never be a mother. So why is that not unfair?

When asked who is most deserving of our kind treatment? The Prophet replied ‘your mother’ three times before saying ‘your father’ only once.

Isn’t that sexist? No matter what a man does, he will never be able to have the status of a mother.
And yet even when God honors us with something uniquely feminine, we are too busy trying to find our worth in reference to men, to value it-or even notice. We too have accepted men as the standard; so anything uniquely feminine is, by definition, inferior. Being sensitive is an insult, becoming a mother-a degradation.

In the battle between stoic rationality (considered masc-uline) and self-less compa-ssion (considered feminine), ration-ality reigns supreme.

As soon as we accept that everything a man has and does is better, all that follows is just a knee jerk reaction: if men have it-we want it too. If men pray in the front rows, we assume this is better, so we want to pray in the front rows too. If men lead prayer, we assume the imam is closer to God, so we want to lead prayer too. Somewhere along the line we’ve accepted the notion that having a position of worldly leadership is some indication of one’s position with God.

A Muslim woman does not need to degrade herself in this way. She has God as a standard. She has God to give her value; she doesn’t need a man.

In fact, in our crusade to follow men, we, as women, never even stopped to examine the possibility that what we have is better for us. In some cases we even gave up what was higher only to be like men.

Fifty years ago, society told us that men were superior because they left the home to work in factories. We were mothers. And yet, we were told that it was women’s liberation to abandon the raising of another human being in order to work on a machine. We accepted that working in a factory was superior to raising the Foundation of society -just because a man did it.

Then after working, we were expected to be superhuman-the perfect mother, the perfect wife, the perfect homemaker -and have the perfect career. And while there is nothing wrong, by definition, with a woman having a career, we soon came to realize what we had sacrificed by blindly mimicking men. We watched as our children became strangers and soon recognized the privilege we’d given up.

And so only now-given the choice-women in the West are choosing to stay home to raise their children.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, only 31 percent of mothers with babies, and 18 percent of mothers with two or more children, are working full-time. And of those working mothers, a survey conducted by Parenting Magazine in 2000, found that 93% of them say they would rather be home with their kids, but are compelled to work due to ‘financial obligations’ .

These ‘obligations’ are imposed on women by the gender sameness of the modern West, and removed from women by the gender distinctiveness of Islam.

It took women in the West almost a century of experimentation to realize a privilege given to Muslim women 1400 years ago.

(The writer is an Egyptian-American free-lance writer. She contributed this article to Media Monitors Network (MMN) from Wisconsin, USA).